Astrophysicist, cosmologist, and NASA advisor Paul Sutter explains thatThe Expanseis his favorite science-fiction series because of its accuracy. Many ofThe Expanse’s episodesare considered masterpieces and the show as a whole is regarded as one of the best in the history of science-fiction television.

The Expanseseasons2-5 all have a 94% or higher score onRotten Tomatoesand the overall show has a Tomatometer score of 95%. The sci-fi series is in a class of its own and has received plenty of praise for its storytelling, but its scientific accuracy is just as impressive.

A male character from The Expanse looking at something offscreen

In anInsidervideo, Sutter explains thatThe Expanseis his favorite science-fiction story set in space because of the realism of its science. This includes how the show sets up its physics and what a functioning human society would look like in space. Check out his response below:

My favorite space movie/TV show is actuallyThe Expanse. It’s a wonderful story, complex, intricate story and there are some non-realistic magical elements. But they work really hard not to just set up the physics correctly, but what society would look like in space, and I really appreciate that.

Prax looking tearful in The Expanse season 3

What This Means For The Expanse

It Stands Apart From Other Great Sci-Fi Shows

Some of theall-time great science-fiction shows, includingDoctor WhoandStranger Things, do not have much basis in real science. What setsThe Expanseapart from series like this is that its characters and storytelling are just as compelling as the real-life science utilized in the narrative.

Sutter emphasizes this by first mentioning the"wonderful"and"complex, intricate"and then touching on the accuracy of the physics and how a society in space is depicted. The show’s scientific merits are impressive in their own right, but they also elevateThe Expanse’s charactersand overarching story.

The Expanse Poster

At the same time, as Sutter acknowledges,The Expansedoes feature some"non-realistic magical elements.“However, these elements do not undermine or overshadow the many facets of actual science that work so well in the show. Despite his expert background when it comes to space, the magical aspects of the show are not a deal-breaker for Sutter.

Our Take On Paul Sutter’s Comments

WithThe Expansearguably beingPrime Video’sGame of Thronesreplacement show, the science is only one of the show’s many strengths. The political intrigue, rivalries between factions, and shocking plot twists are elements that could be fully appreciated and enjoyed without being a scientific expert.

Part of what makesThe Expansesuch an exceptional show is that it can be enjoyed for all those reasons, but it can be just as enjoyable because of how it depicts real-life science. The series is able to appeal to an astrophysicist and NASA advisor like Sutter just as much as it appeals to casual sci-fi fans, and that is an impressive feat in its own right.