Jurassic World Rebirthbreathed new life into theJurassic Parkfranchise, but the franchise’s long-standing questions about thedinosaurs' scientific accuracystill lingered with a new wave of dino clones. The genetic science behind the franchise’s fearsome beasts certainly hasn’t hindered audience interest, asJurassic World Rebirthhas continued to blow past box office benchmarks.
Ever since the franchise’s basic scientific principles were introduced by Mr. DNA way back in 1993, a segment of the audience has always questioned why the dinosaurs shown in the franchise were not accurate to what we know about each respective species. For example, the cinematic velociraptors are famously lacking feathers, are much larger than the typical velociraptor, and had a different head shape.
While the inaccuracies were never really addressed during the originalJurassic Parktrilogy,Jurassic Worldmade sure to clarify the reason for the differences. It makes perfect sense from a narrative standpoint, and really points to the problems behindJurassic Park/Jurassic World’s overarching concept of bringing dinosaurs to life in the modern age.
Dr. Wu Explained Why Jurassic World’s Dinosaurs Aren’t Accurate
Fans Have Questioned Why The Dinosaurs Look Different From What The Fossil Record Shows
BD Wong’s Dr. Henry Wu is depicted as the lead geneticist inJurassic Park, and he maintains that role throughout the first six movies in the franchise, albeit working for different companies and parties across the series. While there was obviously a full staff of scientists on hand at each iteration of the park, Wu is the mastermind behind the dinosaur cloning process.
52%
72%
6.2/10
50/100
5.5/10
When confronted by Simon Masrani inJurassic Worldafter the Indominus Rex broke out and began its rampage, Dr. Wu actually provided a straightforward answer as to why the dinosaurs' appearances and traits aren’t scientifically accurate. While he’s referring to the Indominus Rex at the time, his response actually explains things for the franchise as a whole:
You are acting like we are engaged in some kind of mad science. But we are doing what we have done from the beginning. Nothing in Jurassic World is natural. We have always filled gaps in the genome with the DNA of other animals. (voice rising) And, if their genetic code was pure, many of them would look quite different. But you didn’t ask for reality. You asked for more teeth!
Indominus Rex was designed to be as scary as possible, but to exaggerate the predator features that make it “scary”, other elements of the genome were sacrificed or shifted. That is a foundational aspect of the entire genetic cloning process of the franchise: where there are gaps in the genome, they mix and match DNA from other animals to fill it in.
Because it’s a foundational concept of Ingen’s cloning process, theinaccurate physical appearance of the dinosaursinJurassic World Rebirthwould fall in line with those guidelines. The dinosaurs on Ile Saint-Hubert have supposedly been around for years as rejects from the original park, so they represent the clearest example of inaccurate cloning.
Fortunately, the scientific inaccuracies aren’t actually an issue for the franchise, because Jurassic Park movies have never actually been about the science. Much like the corporate execs clamoring for a scarier Indominus Rex to slap their brand name on, the people who lined up forJurassic World Rebirthcare about whether the dinosaurs on the big screen are cool or scary, not whether they match the fossil record.
